GCC 4.0 Status Report [2005-01-21]
Sat Jan 29 00:22:00 GMT 2005
>>>>> "Mark" == Mark Mitchell <email@example.com> writes:
Mark> Over the past few releases, little or no progress was made on several
Mark> GCJ regressions, despite pings from me via bugzilla; in those cases,
Mark> we probably would have released anyhow, as I would have concluded
Mark> after a while that there wasn't likely to be any progress on those
Yeah, good point.
For our part, we should at least be on top of things enough to reply
to PRs like this to say "this is a regression but we don't consider it
very important" (or in some cases "none of us has the machine to debug
Of the 4 open bugs marked "4.0 regression", I would say we can
outright ignore 2 (18190, 18399) for this release. 10353 requires
someone motivated to fix whatever is going on in the solaris port.
18796 looks most like something we would want to fix (though hairy).
I suppose if we run into something we think is truly awful, we will
make sure to send you email as soon as we discover it.
More information about the Java