Is the bugdatabase alive?
Sun Feb 16 20:26:00 GMT 2003
On Sun, 2003-02-16 at 20:10, Ãyvind Harboe wrote:
> I submitted 9051 a while ago and as near as I can tell,
> the problem is gone in 3.3 (http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl).
> In ignorance of the proper procedure, I thought I'd post the
> information here.
Thanks for reminding. I know I looked at it but couldn't figure out what
was going on. It seems that giving -Os does some optimization that is
not working for gcj produced programs. Strangely I just get a
NullPointerException not an abnormal program termination. But I couldn't
debug it since adding -g makes it disappear. (Will add that info to the
> Whats the deal with the bugdatabase? I get the impression
> that it is dusting in the corner.
Some bugs are, but it is actively used to track the state of the
> I got a grand total of 80 bugs when I listed all libgcj bugs,
> and few of the bugs where assigned.
Bugs only get assigned when someone is actually working on them.
> My impression is that gcj is maintained by various people making
> the changes they need and submitting patches, rather than a group
> of programmers fixing bugs that mortal users find.
Mortal users are programmers :)
Even if nobody is actively working on some bug it is good to have the
information available just so everybody can look it up and/or add
> I've reported a fair number of bugs to http://www.eclipse.org
> and they have a very lively, user-friendly, responsive bugdatabase.
> Great stuff!
What can we do to the bugdatabase to make it more user-friendly?
I believe gcc will switch to bugzilla soon. Maybe that makes it easier
More information about the Java