Build-Breaking MingW 3.3 Stuff
Mon Apr 14 12:46:00 GMT 2003
Mohan Embar writes:
> Hi Andrew,
> >Very good. I take it the patch we need is
> That is correct.
> >I can't help thinking that life would be much nicer if java.nio and
> >java.net had an OS abstraction layer that both used. That way, fixing
> >problems like this wouldn't touch common code.
> This approach was discussed at length, but in the end,
> Adam Megacz decided against it and instead
> recommended forking the Win32 net code and Posix code
Sounds like that's exactly what I'm suggesting.
> Michael has forked the Win32 and Posix code at the trunk:
That patch doesn't seem to touch java.nio, which is where the problem
we're discussing lies.
More information about the Java