Sat Oct 12 03:26:00 GMT 2002
Adam Megacz wrote:
>Cedric Berger <email@example.com> writes:
>>Makes you think that they have a Static+JIT (or interpreter) model
>>like GCJ which fully implements the java model - so no problem
>>including Sun classes. Cedric
>I doubt that -- their main claim to fame is shrinking the download
>size (ie not requiring the JRE) -- but if you support runtime loaded
>classes, you have to have the *entire* JRE library around, since you
>don't know what classes/methods might be needed at runtime.
You may be right. But you could also design a scheme where missing jre
be downloaded automatically after-installation. Who knows.
>Of course, all this is total speculation... I guess what we really
>need is to hear from somebody who's used the product.
More information about the Java