3.1.1 criteria

[Bryce McKinlay]

Adam Megacz wrote:

>Here's what's on my plate. None of the following affect binary
>compatability.
>
>    - Win32 stack traces [already submitted the patch]
>    - Make Win32Process work
>    - Hash Synchronization (this already works, I just have to merge patches)
>    - Closer review of java.io.* for proper error handling
>
>Also, I'd like to fix Win32's notifyAll() [which is really, really
>broken], but I have a feeling that it will break binary compatability
>(only on Win32), since the mutex lock/unlock functions get inlined.
>

I think all of this stuff is fine for 3.1.1, at least as long as it 
doesn't touch the generic code too much. Unless I'm mistaken, binary 
compatibility for win32 shouldn't be much of an issue since we don't 
support a libgcj DLL yet.

>Also, Bryce, do you think you'll have time to look at this before
>3.1.1?
>
>    http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java/2002-04/msg00276.html
>  
>

Yeah, hopefully I'll get a chance to have another look at it in the next 
week or so.

regards

Bryce.