Why is jni.j installed in ${prefix}/include?

[Tom Tromey]

>>>>> "Per" == Per Bothner <per@bothner.com> writes:

Per> Well, it shouldn't change so often.  in fact, it is supposed to
Per> be Java-implementation-dependent.  I.e. you should be able to use
Per> the same version of jni.h for code running with GCJ as for code
Per> running under JDK.  To the extent you can't do that, it's a bug.
Per> Please submit patches ...

In the past our jni.h wasn't all that implementation independent.
The current CVS version has made progress in this area.  I think it is
pretty good right now.

Tom