GCJ problem on RS/6000
Fri Feb 8 15:10:00 GMT 2002
>>>>> "David" == David Edelsohn <email@example.com> writes:
David> Other than convenience, I do not see any reason that GCJ and
David> G++ need to generate $ in symbol names. GCJ could translate
David> everything rot13 or EBCDIC because the spec cannot impose
David> requirements at that level.
David> Allowing $ in identifiers is one thing, but blindly copying
David> them through to assembly files when NO_DOLLAR_IN_LABEL is
David> defined creates big problems for portability of GCC, G++ and
Please see Bryce's post on the subject:
I think Bryce's approach here sounds good. The corresponding change
to g++ would have to be made, as we require compatible mangling.
See also the discussion that occurred when we last changed this part
More information about the Java