JAXP suggestions

[Anthony Green]

On Tue, 2002-12-03 at 01:58, Tom Tromey wrote:
> Anthony> That being said, there's something that's bothering me about
> Anthony> his proposal.  For one, my model of building rhug packages
> Anthony> where all dependent packages are in an uninstalled build tree
> Anthony> isn't addressed, is it?
> 
> Isn't that fixed by adding -L options to the link line?  I think I
> don't understand the situation.

No, because the jar files weren't in an extensions directory to start
with.

> Option [3] was:
> 
>     3. Keep using GNUJAXP, Xerces, etc as separate packages from libgcj
>     (with the exception of the core JRE-tracking org.xml/w3c classes).

Ah, sorry.  Those weren't supposed to be 3 options.  They are three
things we should do.

AG