Brad Cox wrote: >Am I expecting too much? Is libgcj's java.security supposed to be >complete? > >This is on Linux 7.0 with gcc3.0.1 latest build (downloaded today). > The current CVS gcj has a much more complete java.security than 3.0.x. See http://gcc.gnu.org/java/download.html for instructions on how to get it from cvs. regards Bryce.