Playing with latest [lib]gcj

[Alexandre Petit-Bianco]

`Jeff Sturm writes:

> I think this is the old array initializer problem (didn't you fix
> that once?).

I don't remember. I'll have to look at the source of the test
case. Or, could you file a PR with the involved source code?

> Replacing the double array declaration with element-at-a-time
> initializers seems to work, as does compiling from bytecode.

Good to hear we can have it to run.

./A