Playing with latest [lib]gcj

[Jeff Sturm]

Alexandre Petit-Bianco wrote:
> 
> Mark Wielaard writes:
> 
> > I tried first compiling the java files to class files with jikes and
> > then compiling the class file with gcj and that seems to give much
> > more reasonable results.
> 
> So we might have a bug in the source front-end. If you happen to
> investigate this a bit more, filling PRs would be much appreciated. At
> any rates, I'm putting this on my TODO list.

I think this is the old array initializer problem (didn't you fix that
once?).
Replacing the double array declaration with element-at-a-time
initializers seems to work, as does compiling from bytecode.

--
Jeff Sturm
jeff.sturm@appnet.com