Issue with a flag that I defined getting set to zero

[Gabriel Ravier]

On 1/7/22 09:38, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 1/7/22 09:30, Gary Oblock wrote:
>> Regarding the corporate legal gibberish. It's automatic
>> and not under my control also we're not supposed to
>> use private emails for work...
>
> I respect that. But please respect me that I won't reply to your
> emails any longer. I don't want to follow the conditions in the NOTICE!
>
> Cheers,
> Martin
>
As far as I know the notice has no legal significance at all (which Gary 
should probably point out to his management. Really, pretty much the 
only thing the disclaimer will do is that _some_ people _might_ read it 
and _some_ of those people _might_ adhere to the terms given there, 
which is basically meaningless compared to the general annoyance 
resulting from disclaimers being at the end of e-mails everywhere). You 
can't just magically establish an agreement that results in a duty of 
nondisclosure like this without agreement, and just receiving an email 
obviously isn't that.

(although ironically, I guess I should add a disclaimer of my own: I 
ain't a lawyer and this isn't legal advice)