GCC Git hooks
Joseph Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com
Fri Jan 10 18:15:00 GMT 2020
On Fri, 10 Jan 2020, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> > Plus one further change now: if a newly created branch is in refs/heads/,
> > require it to be in refs/heads/devel/ or refs/heads/releases/ (i.e.
> > enforce a particular branch naming convention, in particular to prevent
> > mistakes where people accidentally push a branch into refs/heads/ because
> > their push configuration for user or vendor branches was wrong).
>
> I'm having a hard time understanding this requirement.
>
> You want to say that, before branch "<xxx>" gets created, you want
> to verify that a branch named either "devel/<xxx>" or "releases/<xxx>"
> does exist?
No. What we want to ensure is that people don't accidentally create a
branch called refs/heads/foo when they should (by our naming conventions)
have created one called refs/heads/devel/foo or
refs/users/someone/heads/foo. Our naming conventions mean that all
branches in refs/heads/ should be called master, devel/something or
releases/something. But it's easy for someone to get a "git push" command
wrong so that it would create a badly named branch.
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com
More information about the Gcc
mailing list