Proposal for the transition timetable for the move to GIT

[Richard Earnshaw (lists)]

On 11/12/2019 15:19, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Dec 2019 at 15:03, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
>> I wouldn't bother with that.  There are known defects in the version of
>> reposurgeon that I used to produce that which have since been fixed.  It
>> was *never* the point of that upload to ask for correctness checks on
>> the conversion (I said so at the time).  Instead it was intended to
>> demonstrate the improvements to the commit summaries that I think we can
>> make.
> 
> My concern is that there is no conversion done using reposurgeon that
> *can* be used to do correctness checks.
> 

I have concerns too, but I'm in contact with the reposurgeon guys and
progress *is* being made.

R.