Proposal for the transition timetable for the move to GIT

[Jonathan Wakely]

On Wed, 11 Dec 2019 at 15:03, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
> I wouldn't bother with that.  There are known defects in the version of
> reposurgeon that I used to produce that which have since been fixed.  It
> was *never* the point of that upload to ask for correctness checks on
> the conversion (I said so at the time).  Instead it was intended to
> demonstrate the improvements to the commit summaries that I think we can
> make.

My concern is that there is no conversion done using reposurgeon that
*can* be used to do correctness checks.