Warning annoyances in list_read.c

Richard Biener richard.guenther@gmail.com
Mon Mar 27 18:21:00 GMT 2017

On March 27, 2017 7:59:01 PM GMT+02:00, Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> wrote:
>Am 27.03.2017 um 19:41 schrieb Marek Polacek:
>> Of course "the person" had bootstrapped and tested all the languages
>> adding the warning.  If only any of you bothered to check the
>> ChangeLogs:
>The problem is with libfortran, which apparently was not tested
>(or the problem would have been found and, presumably, dealt with).
>So, due to incomplete testing, a regression was caused.  This has
>probably happened a few thousand times before, so it is not an
>exceptionally big deal.

Well, the issue is that libgfortran seems to be built without -Werror.

>We should deal with this the same way we deal with other regressions -
>fix it or, if anything else fails, roll back the offending patch.
>The person who is responsible for the regression should usually take
>lead in fixing it.
>Since the fix appears to be rather trivial, I promise to review
>any patch that falls into my area of review (fortran, libfortran)
>within 48 hours.
>Would this be acceptable to everybody (please)?
>	Thomas

More information about the Gcc mailing list