Warning annoyances in list_read.c

Jonathan Wakely jwakely.gcc@gmail.com
Mon Mar 27 18:21:00 GMT 2017


On 27 March 2017 at 18:59, Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> wrote:
> Am 27.03.2017 um 19:41 schrieb Marek Polacek:
>
>> Of course "the person" had bootstrapped and tested all the languages
>> before
>> adding the warning.  If only any of you bothered to check the fortran/
>> ChangeLogs:
>
>
> The problem is with libfortran, which apparently was not tested
> (or the problem would have been found and, presumably, dealt with).
>
> So, due to incomplete testing, a regression was caused.  This has
> probably happened a few thousand times before, so it is not an
> exceptionally big deal.
>
> We should deal with this the same way we deal with other regressions -
> fix it or, if anything else fails, roll back the offending patch.
> The person who is responsible for the regression should usually take the
> lead in fixing it.
>
> Since the fix appears to be rather trivial, I promise to review
> any patch that falls into my area of review (fortran, libfortran)
> within 48 hours.
>
> Would this be acceptable to everybody (please)?

Dominique already provided a patch.



More information about the Gcc mailing list