libitm.a and sjlj.o object

[Victor Martinez]

On 09/20/13 17:20, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 09/12/2013 03:22 AM, Víctor Martínez wrote:
>> Why is sjlj.o the only one built for armv4 while the rest of objects are armv5t?
>> Is this behaviour expected? Or is there something wrong trying to configure gcc
>> with these options?
> There are co-processor instructions in there that can't be encoded with thumb1,
> as present on armv5t.  It is as expected.
>
>
> r~
Thank you very much for the clarification.

-- 
Learning bit by bit
Victor Martinez | http://lokalix.dyndns.org