libitm.a and sjlj.o object

Richard Henderson rth@redhat.com
Fri Sep 20 15:20:00 GMT 2013


On 09/12/2013 03:22 AM, Víctor Martínez wrote:
> Why is sjlj.o the only one built for armv4 while the rest of objects are armv5t?
> Is this behaviour expected? Or is there something wrong trying to configure gcc
> with these options?

There are co-processor instructions in there that can't be encoded with thumb1,
as present on armv5t.  It is as expected.


r~



More information about the Gcc mailing list