End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010

[NightStrike]

On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 09/06/2010 06:18 PM, NightStrike wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Richard Guenther
>> <richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 6:19 PM, NightStrike <nightstrike@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 5:21 AM, Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de> wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 6 Sep 2010, Tobias Burnus wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>>>>>>> Do you have a pointer to testresults you'd like us to use for reference?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  From our release criteria, for secondary platforms we have:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    • The compiler bootstraps successfully, and the C++ runtime library
>>>>>>>      builds.
>>>>>>>    • The DejaGNU testsuite has been run, and a substantial majority of the
>>>>>>>      tests pass.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> See for instance:
>>>>>>   http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-09/msg00295.html
>>>>>
>>>>> There are no libstdc++ results in that.
>>>>>
>>>>> Richard.
>>>>
>>>> This is true.  I always run make check-gcc.  What should I be doing instead?
>>>
>>> make -k check
>>>
>>
>> Ugh.  And I thought I was golden :)
>>
>> This apparently requires autogen to do something about
>> fixincludes/check.tpl.  I have no idea what that is or what that
>> means....
>
> Just ignore the fixincludes test results.
>
> Andrew.
>

Thanks!  Life just got easier again :)

Running it with -j5.  Hopefully cygwin doesn't barf on that.. I know
cygwin used to have issues with -j.