Sorry to mention aliasing again, but is the standard IN6_ARE_ADDR_EQUAL really wrong?

[Andrew Haley]

On 01/10/2010 12:39 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> writes:
> 
>> Why do you say the effective type is different?
> 
> The object type is uint8_t, but accessed as uint32_t.  That is
> undefined.

Unless uint8_t is a character type, as I understand it.  That is
clearly the assumption on which the code relies.

Andrew.