Thu Jul 12 15:42:00 GMT 2007
>> It has not yet been decided what to do about files that are part of
>> run-time libraries and are covered by GPL/LGPL + exception.
>> Therefore, no changes to
>I find this truncated sentence to be slightly ominous as I believe
>there is only one plausible choice for those files: we must convert
>them to be GPLv3/LGPLv3 + exception, where the exception is identical
>or equivalent to the current one. Adding any restrictions to the
>licensing of those files will cost us a significant portion of our
I see this as a less ominous development than you.
I think the issue is that the FSF may be trying to come up with a
unified GPLv3 + exception that libjava, libstdc++, libgfortran, libgcc,
etc. can all use. The current exception wording is being reviewed with
the existing GPLv3 text by lawyers.
Certainly, this would be an improvement over the current practice.
More information about the Gcc