Question about ObjC++ state

[Mark Mitchell]

Mike Stump wrote:
> If such a patch 
> were submitted, it would have to go into mainline first anyway, if it 
> proves safe there and people want to propose a version of it for 4.0.x, 
> then I think the RM would have to reevaluate it on its merits and risks 
> and the timing.  I don't see the need for the RM to declare at this 
> point what a future decision would be.  I suspect that if done well, the 
> RM would entertain allowing it in 4.0.[n+1]; but that is just speculation.

I have it on good authority that the RM agrees with all of the 
statements above.

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark@codesourcery.com
(916) 791-8304