Question about new warning system

[Gabriel Dos Reis]

DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com> writes:

| > I don't care if it's spelt warn_foo, OPT_Wfoo, warning_p(foo) or
| > whatever, so long as it's spelt only one way.  The 'warning
| > (OPT_Wfoo, ...)' syntax helps only where there is no conditional
| > before the warning -- how often does that occur?  The way it
| > currently is, one runs the risk of writing
| 
| It's confusing now because it's in transition.  Eventually, the use of
| warn_foo will become rare, and the OPT_foo will be the preferred
| method of controlling diagnostics.  Only 664 more warnings to go!

The sooner, the better :-)

-- Gaby