Question about new warning system

[DJ Delorie]

> I don't care if it's spelt warn_foo, OPT_Wfoo, warning_p(foo) or
> whatever, so long as it's spelt only one way.  The 'warning
> (OPT_Wfoo, ...)' syntax helps only where there is no conditional
> before the warning -- how often does that occur?  The way it
> currently is, one runs the risk of writing

It's confusing now because it's in transition.  Eventually, the use of
warn_foo will become rare, and the OPT_foo will be the preferred
method of controlling diagnostics.  Only 664 more warnings to go!