forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking

[Mike Stump]

On Jan 26, 2005, at 8:21 PM, Edward Peschko wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 05:06:34AM +0100, Marcin Dalecki wrote:
>> Uninformed that you are you are misguiding people to waist their time.
>> You have no clue. There is no "official" glibc release
>> out there remotely compatible with kernel 2.6 and gcc 3.4. Thus there
>> isn't
>> anything out there SuSE could be incompatible with.
> man... where did that piece of venom come from? I've got to ask you a
> question - if there is 'no standard', how can LSB is the answer?

Off topic flame wars don't belong here, please, go find another sandbox 
to play it.  This list for gcc flame wars only.  :-)