forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking

[Marcin Dalecki]

On 2005-01-27, at 15:35, Dan Kegel wrote:

> Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> glibc-2.3.4 has been widely tested and is certainly stable.
>
> But not, alas, well announced:
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-announce/2005/
> is empty.

Yep. And glibc-2.3.4 is still ours and not days old.
However it still contains the same mistakes as ever for a true cross OS 
build...