SC decision on version numbering: 4.0

[Daniel Berlin]

On Thu, 9 Sep 2004, Joseph S. Myers wrote:

> On Thu, 9 Sep 2004, Mike Stump wrote:
>
>> I ask because I wasn't sure if we should leave 3.5.0 in here, or remove it
>> entirely.
>
> We have 2.96 and 2.97 versions in the database, which track that bugs were
> reported against mainline in given date ranges, though there were no such
> releases.  But in the present instance the database seems to have been
> bulk converted from 3.5 to 4.0 without keeping such a distinction in the
> reported versions.

Wasn't me, :)
I think andrew did it.