SC decision on version numbering: 4.0

[Joseph S. Myers]

On Thu, 9 Sep 2004, Mike Stump wrote:

> I ask because I wasn't sure if we should leave 3.5.0 in here, or remove it
> entirely.

We have 2.96 and 2.97 versions in the database, which track that bugs were 
reported against mainline in given date ranges, though there were no such 
releases.  But in the present instance the database seems to have been 
bulk converted from 3.5 to 4.0 without keeping such a distinction in the 
reported versions.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers               http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~jsm28/gcc/
  http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~jsm28/gcc/#c90status - status of C90 for GCC 3.5
    jsm@polyomino.org.uk (personal mail)
    jsm28@gcc.gnu.org (Bugzilla assignments and CCs)