Why don't we set up an official wiki for GCC documentation?

[Daniel Berlin]

On Sep 9, 2004, at 4:35 PM, Stan Shebs wrote:

> Daniel Berlin wrote:
>
>>
>> [...] I don't think wiki is a good solution for our documentation 
>> right now. Our documentation is mostly in .texi, which isn't hard to 
>> modify at all.
>
> One win for a wiki in this case is that it's a way to "prototype"
> documentation; everybody bang on a description of a neglected area,
> converge on something that seems good, then submit as a patch to
> the .texi files. The patch process is kind of inefficient for
> wordsmithing, as the lengthy doc patch threads suggest.
>

You guys can use the Wiki for whatever you want. Certainly, I won't 
stop you :)

> Stan
>