Why don't we set up an official wiki for GCC documentation?

[Stan Shebs]

Daniel Berlin wrote:

>
> [...] I don't think wiki is a good solution for our documentation 
> right now. Our documentation is mostly in .texi, which isn't hard to 
> modify at all.

One win for a wiki in this case is that it's a way to "prototype"
documentation; everybody bang on a description of a neglected area,
converge on something that seems good, then submit as a patch to
the .texi files. The patch process is kind of inefficient for
wordsmithing, as the lengthy doc patch threads suggest.

Stan