GCC IMA & general future proposal

[Geoff Keating]

On 27/10/2004, at 11:54 AM, Chris Lattner wrote:

> On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Geoff Keating wrote:
>>>> It's short, but has a complicated diagram. It is intended for
>>>> discussion
>>>> at the meeting in a few hours.
>>>
>>> Has anyone seriously considered using or adopting LLVM
>>> (http://llvm.org)?
>>> It seems to provide just about everything on your diagram, and is 
>>> also
>>> quite efficient.
>>>
>>> Even if it is not an option, I would really be interested to hear why
>>> not and what is missing.  In particular, LLVM is mutable, and it's
>>> easier to add things to it than to reinvent the whole thing.  :)
>>
>> It's the part where you have to add everything that GCC has that LLVM
>> doesn't that seems to be the problem.
>
> Heh, likewise, you're talking about adding everything that LLVM has to
> GCC.  :)

Right.  So, which is the larger source base, LLVM or GCC?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2410 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/attachments/20041027/0fbfbd76/attachment.p7s>