GCC IMA & general future proposal

[Chris Lattner]

On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Geoff Keating wrote:
> >> It's short, but has a complicated diagram. It is intended for
> >> discussion
> >> at the meeting in a few hours.
> >
> > Has anyone seriously considered using or adopting LLVM
> > (http://llvm.org)?
> > It seems to provide just about everything on your diagram, and is also
> > quite efficient.
> >
> > Even if it is not an option, I would really be interested to hear why
> > not and what is missing.  In particular, LLVM is mutable, and it's
> > easier to add things to it than to reinvent the whole thing.  :)
>
> It's the part where you have to add everything that GCC has that LLVM
> doesn't that seems to be the problem.

Heh, likewise, you're talking about adding everything that LLVM has to
GCC.  :)

-Chris

-- 
http://llvm.org/
http://nondot.org/sabre/