Guidelines for building fixincludes for targets?

[E. Weddington]

Aaron W. LaFramboise wrote:

>E. Weddington wrote:
>
>  
>
>>1. Is mkfixinc.sh the correct place to do this?
>>2. Would not building fixincl make sense for this target?
>>3. I assume that I should do the usual route of submitting bug report, 
>>patch to gcc-patches, etc. Correct?
>>    
>>
>
>Its my understanding that fixincludes should not be built for targets
>that have nothing to fix.  This was previously done for a number of
>targets, but the logic for this was lost during the fixincludes
>transition to top-level.
>
>  
>
I guess this also brings up the question of how many targets need 
fixincludes? Would it be better to have an opt-in list, rather than an 
opt-out list? That way new targets won't automatically have fixincludes 
built.

Eric