Guidelines for building fixincludes for targets?

[Aaron W. LaFramboise]

E. Weddington wrote:

> 1. Is mkfixinc.sh the correct place to do this?
> 2. Would not building fixincl make sense for this target?
> 3. I assume that I should do the usual route of submitting bug report, 
> patch to gcc-patches, etc. Correct?

Its my understanding that fixincludes should not be built for targets
that have nothing to fix.  This was previously done for a number of
targets, but the logic for this was lost during the fixincludes
transition to top-level.

Someone needs to review this patch to the toplevel configure:
<http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-09/msg00934.html>.  Perhaps
*-avr should be included in that patch also.

Aaron W. LaFramboise