Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0?

[Ziemowit Laski]

On 18 Nov 2004, at 20.25, Matt Austern wrote:

> This discussion should probably happen offline.  It's in Apple's 
> interest for ObjC++ to get into mainline.  It's also in Apple's 
> interest to make sure that there aren't any changes that hurt compiler 
> performance.  It's silly for this discussion to be happening on an 
> international email list when most of the people participating in it 
> have offices on the same floor of the same building.

Yes, some of this "silliness" (although it is symptomatic of things 
more serious) really should be confined to Apple, although I don't 
think it is appropriate to take the whole discussion offline 
altogether.  Just as currently Geoff is blocking an approach that Mark 
and Zack OKed (at least in principle), one could certainly envision 
Mark, Zack or others objecting to whatever we finally manage to agree 
upon in Cupertino.

--Zem