question about AltiVec builtins

[Aldy Hernandez]

On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 09:52:43AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> I wrote back in February:
> 
> >     "The same is for gcc.dg/simd-1.c and gcc.dg/20020531-1.c, where
> >     one was checking for incompatibility between vector types with
> >     different signedness but the same mode, and the other was happily
> >     passing an unsigned V8QI to __builtin_ia32_paddusb which expects a
> >     signed V8QI.
> 
> And when I cited this to Aldy, he said:
> 
> > I agree that, for simd-1.c, the test should not expect an error on
> > sign difference.

Well, if the testcase no longer applies, it should be removed.

Aldy