question about AltiVec builtins
Wed May 12 07:51:00 GMT 2004
I wrote back in February:
> "The same is for gcc.dg/simd-1.c and gcc.dg/20020531-1.c, where
> one was checking for incompatibility between vector types with
> different signedness but the same mode, and the other was happily
> passing an unsigned V8QI to __builtin_ia32_paddusb which expects a
> signed V8QI.
And when I cited this to Aldy, he said:
> I agree that, for simd-1.c, the test should not expect an error on
> sign difference.
More information about the Gcc