Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA trees on MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03

[Daniel Berlin]

On May 4, 2004, at 5:28 PM, Karel Gardas wrote:

> On Tue, 4 May 2004, Daniel Berlin wrote:
>
>> These were without checking enabled on both compilers, right?
>> (Checking is more expensive on tree-ssa than with mainline)
>
> Sure! I've made this mistake just once! :-)

Oh, just checking.
In that case, can you tar up the -ftime-report's and throw them 
somewhere, so we can get a feel for what is taking up the most time?