Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA trees on MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03

[Karel Gardas]

On Tue, 4 May 2004, Daniel Berlin wrote:

> These were without checking enabled on both compilers, right?
> (Checking is more expensive on tree-ssa than with mainline)

Sure! I've made this mistake just once! :-)

$ c++ -v
Reading specs from
/mnt/karel/gcc-main-20040504/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.5.0/specs
Configured with: ../gcc-main/configure
--prefix=/mnt/karel/gcc-main-20040504 --enable-shared --enable-threads
--enable-languages=c++ --disable-checking --enable-__cxa_atexit
Thread model: posix
gcc version 3.5.0 20040504 (experimental)
$

$ /mnt/karel/tree-ssa-20040504/bin/c++ -v
Reading specs from
/mnt/karel/tree-ssa-20040504/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.5-tree-ssa/specs
Configured with: ../tree-ssa/configure
--prefix=/mnt/karel/tree-ssa-20040504 --enable-shared --enable-threads
--enable-languages=c++ --disable-checking --enable-__cxa_atexit
Thread model: posix
gcc version 3.5-tree-ssa 20040504 (merged 20040428)
$

Karel
--
Karel Gardas                  kgardas@objectsecurity.com
ObjectSecurity Ltd.           http://www.objectsecurity.com