What's gcc-prs for?!?

[Andrew Pinski]

On Feb 16, 2004, at 04:43, Giovanni Bajo wrote:

> Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>
>> I *thought* it had been agreed in the last time we went round this
>> discussion loop that gcc-prs is where all the bugzilla dribblings
>> would be forwarded, leaving gcc-bugs for just new reports.
>
> To what effect? It looks like many new reports are invalid and closed 
> in a
> shot.

Well it is easy to separate email using rules based on the subject line 
which
is what I do.  I have a "New bugs" folder where all the new bug reports 
go,
most of the time, I just go through each bug and either delete it as 
already
being analyzed, delete after confirming it and putting it into the 
right place,
or sometimes leave it in because I need to go back and look at later.

gcc-bugs for me is easy to track but then again I am the one who is 
making most
of the traffic in the first place.

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski