What's gcc-prs for?!?

[Giovanni Bajo]

Richard Earnshaw wrote:

> I *thought* it had been agreed in the last time we went round this
> discussion loop that gcc-prs is where all the bugzilla dribblings
> would be forwarded, leaving gcc-bugs for just new reports.

To what effect? It looks like many new reports are invalid and closed in a
shot.

> Anyway, I find gcc-bugs impossible to track these days -- there's
> just too much noise on it.

We asked many times on inputs about this. Would you please provide some
examples of messages that you think are just noise and could be filtered away
from gcc-bugs?

Giovanni Bajo