IA64 inline division question

[Al Stone]

On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 13:03, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> > According to Intel's documentation of Itanium2 it should 
> > be fmac.  So we could change it to fmac if Itanium1 has no problems. 
> 
> Do we really need to care for Itanium1 in the context of GCC 3.5?
> 
> Personally, I really wouldn't care about anything older than McKinley 
> for GCC 3.5, but YMMV.  Andreas, what do you think?
> 
> > Unfortunately I have no available Itanium1, so can not check this.
> 
> Andreas and me have.

And I have several, too (not all of them in use, tho').

> Gerald
-- 
Ciao,
al
----------------------------
Al Stone
Linux & Open Source Lab
Hewlett-Packard Company
E-mail: ahs3@fc.hp.com
----------------------------