IA64 inline division question

[Gerald Pfeifer]

On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> According to Intel's documentation of Itanium2 it should 
> be fmac.  So we could change it to fmac if Itanium1 has no problems. 

Do we really need to care for Itanium1 in the context of GCC 3.5?

Personally, I really wouldn't care about anything older than McKinley 
for GCC 3.5, but YMMV.  Andreas, what do you think?

> Unfortunately I have no available Itanium1, so can not check this.

Andreas and me have.

Gerald