Anonymous Namespaces

[Jan Hubicka]

> On 1 Feb 2004, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> 
> > Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz> writes:
> > 
> > | I am having related problem with unit-at-a-time.  With -fwhole program I
> > | need to make functions that are public in C/C++ static for the backend.
> > | I am having prototype patch, but still I am holding because I am unsure
> > | whether clearing up TREE_PUBLIC in cgraph_optimize is TRT.
> > | Given that we want to declare TREE_PUBLIC to be in backend's semantic
> > | and make frontends to use different flag when these don't match (that is
> > | with -fwhole-program almost always),  I think I can update the patch and
> > | propose it for mainline once I am done with merging the tree-SSA cgraph
> > | code back.
> > 
> > I'll hold on your patch then.
> 
> So can someone give me an idea if this change, or a related one that gives 
> functions declared inside anonymous namesspaces, will make it into Gcc 
> 3.4?

The -fwhole-program patch definitly won't go for 3.4.  In fact I would
prefer first some kind fo plan how to deal with the difference of
linkages in between frontend and backend notion before pushing that
patch out, so I am not sure I will to that very soon even for mainline.

My patch is not going to solve problem above, it is just hitting it in
yet annother scenario, so if we will fix it, I would hope that we can do
that for 3.4 too.

Honza
> 
> -- 
> http://kevin.atkinson.dhs.org