Anonymous Namespaces
Kevin Atkinson
kevina@gnu.org
Sun Feb 1 14:09:00 GMT 2004
On 1 Feb 2004, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz> writes:
>
> | I am having related problem with unit-at-a-time. With -fwhole program I
> | need to make functions that are public in C/C++ static for the backend.
> | I am having prototype patch, but still I am holding because I am unsure
> | whether clearing up TREE_PUBLIC in cgraph_optimize is TRT.
> | Given that we want to declare TREE_PUBLIC to be in backend's semantic
> | and make frontends to use different flag when these don't match (that is
> | with -fwhole-program almost always), I think I can update the patch and
> | propose it for mainline once I am done with merging the tree-SSA cgraph
> | code back.
>
> I'll hold on your patch then.
So can someone give me an idea if this change, or a related one that gives
functions declared inside anonymous namesspaces, will make it into Gcc
3.4?
--
http://kevin.atkinson.dhs.org
More information about the Gcc
mailing list