[tree-ssa] labels after returns

[Andrew Pinski]

On Apr 12, 2004, at 12:35, law@redhat.com wrote:
>>  Didn't you go through FC packages fixing these things up?
> Err, I certainly didn't trip over this building the FC2 stuff.  If you 
> look
> at Andrew's testcase it's actually from c-torture and clearly there's 
> some
> target dependent lameness involved since we're not tripping over this
> (at least not in a clearly visible way from the testsuite's point of 
> view)
> on i686-pc-linux-gnu.

The target dependent lameness is that every local label has to defined 
in the assembly file
and not be a non local label; local labels are defined as starting with 
a `L'.

So Darwin is showing that the labels are missing from the assembly file 
while Linux would not
care and assemble the file and have an extern reference to that label.  
So Darwin is showing
that the label is not there and that there is no run test for this, 
maybe we should add the
following link test which shows the problem every where, including on 
Linux (I just tested it)?

int i;
int
main()
{
l1:
     i = &&l1-&&l2;
     return 0;
l2:;
}

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski