[tree-ssa] labels after returns

[Graham Stott]

Diego Novillo wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-04-12 at 12:35, law@redhat.com wrote:
> 
> 
>> >Regardless.  Are they not invalid? 
>>It is valid code.
>>
> 
> OK.  I must've confused it with some other problem then.  Something
> about labels not allowed right before the closing brace.  But I don't
> pay enough attention to these things.
GCC used to allow (not sure if it still does)

	label: }

The standard requires a statement after the label even if it's
an empty

	label:
		;
	}

> 
> 
> Thanks.  Diego.
> 

Cheers
Graham