HORRIBLE inliner defaillance

[Paolo Carlini]

Benjamin Kosnik wrote:

>See:
>http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2003-02/msg00302.html
>(This is what should be linked in the TODO, sorry)
>
For the record, I have now actually tried changing the
signature as suggested by Richard.

For a plain function it works, for a template function it works,
for a deep template hierarchy as std::copy -> __copy_trivial
does not, unfortunately :(

I have of course tried playing with the inlining parameters,
without success, probably the problem it's not just size...

... will return to that in a few days.

Paolo.