Sibcall arguments passed on the stack

[John David Anglin]

> rth suggested here
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-09/msg00828.html
> that the stack slots ought to be in CALL_INSN_FUNCTION_USAGE.
> My patch, which started that thread, will not fix 12372, so rth
> is probably right, as usual.

Yes, that appears to be the best fix.  What had bothered me about it
was there appears to have been a concious decision not to add stack
slots to the CALL_INSN_FUNCTION_USAGE.

Dave
-- 
J. David Anglin                                  dave.anglin@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca
National Research Council of Canada              (613) 990-0752 (FAX: 952-6602)